Friday, September 8, 2017

Illegal Voters May Have Decided New Hamster Election in 2016

h/t Diogenes' Middle Finger

But.....but there's no such thing as voter fraud.
PJMedia - "Newly available data is casting doubt on the integrity of the presidential election in New Hampshire in 2016, which Hillary Clinton won by just over 2,700 votes. Over 6,000 voters in New Hampshire had used same-day voter registration procedures to register and vote simultaneously for president.

The current New Hampshire speaker of the House, Shawn Jasper, sought and obtained data about what happened to these 6,000 "new" New Hampshire voters who showed up on Election Day. It seems the overwhelming majority of them can no longer be found in New Hampshire.
Of those 6,000, only 1,014 have ever obtained New Hampshire driver's licenses. Of the 5,526 voters who never obtained a New Hampshire driver's license, a mere three percent have registered a vehicle in New Hampshire. The Public Interest Legal Foundation received information that 70 percent of the same-day registrants used out-of-state photo ID to vote in the 2016 presidential election in New Hampshire and to utilize same-day registration. Gov. Maggie Hassan, a Democrat, also defeated incumbent U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte by only 1,017 votes.
These new data illustrate the problem with same-day registration laws: they prevent the ability to verify residency prior to the election -- and in a close election, that can make a difference. As John Fund and Hans von Spakovsky pointed out in their book Who's Counting, same-day registration fraud won Al Franken his Senate seat, and that extra Democratic seat then gave the country Obamacare."
No telling how many of those voters in Hew Hamster weren't just illegal voters, but also illegal aliens, recolonizing the outer reaches of traditional Aztlan/Assland. But statistics alone suggest the overlap between the two in many states is nowhere close to zero, all the way to the Canadian border.

Meanwhile, the Texas voter ID law is constitutional, and a full "GO", providing 49 other states with a template to knock off the silly games upon which we and the shitweasels in Congress have turned a blind eye ever since the Clinton Crime Syndicate's godfather got the Motor-Voter Act passed by his reliably communist congress in 1993. 

And in that little do-si-doe the president and Congress did yesterday with Harvey Relief, the House found time to sneak in a provision to pay for education in the f**king Third World, but no money for the Border Wall here in the US, which money was allocated every time it came up when Obama was president, and it had no chance in hell of ever being spent.

And nota bene not one peep from anyone in Congress about that.


And then?
Simple Rule Of Thumb: First you plug the leaks, then you bail out the boat.

We can start with the Dream Act criminals, and their families.
Then start combing the employment lists of companies nationwide, starting with those named with the letter "A". One to five illegals there just get deported; any company with 6 or more, the CEO, CFO, and HR manager also get frog-marched to federal prison for conspiracy to commit employment fraud, and abetting illegal immigration.
By Wednesday after that starts, every illegal in America will be fired in perpetuity.

By the second week, when we get to the companies whose names start with "B", the traffic backups on I-5 and I-35 heading south will be back to Santa Barbara in CA and Oklahoma City in the Midwest, and American companies will probably have to start paying $10-15/hr for service jobs, as employment tops 98%. And at that point, the public approval rating of the President and Congress goes to 80%.

Fail to do it, and a lot of people in Congress will be looking for jobs next November.

Slash welfare payouts and eligibility at the same time, and get people on the job, and off our backs. Which only works every time you try it.


Anonymous said...

Why doesn't the POTUS write an Executive Order which declares all employer ILLEGAL alien hiring to be a punishable crime. Whether mandatory sentence or a stiff fine ($10,000 per offense), both employers and illegal aliens will be held accountable. To which the illegal alien will self deport - they are here for jobs, no jobs, no reason to hang around.

Aesop said...

Because it's already a federal crime.

And if you think $40-60K/yr in freebies and welfare benefits is no reason to hang around, I've got a bridge to sell you.

loren said...

Perhaps if we went back to the Founders version of voter rights or even Bob Heinlein's version we'd have a chance. With every warm body over 17 being able to vote, we'll never see the light of day.

l2a3 said...

Everyone needs to bring up the FACT that the Democrats ALL READY PROMISED AMERICA TO FUND THE WALL 15-20 YEARS AGO, but no one ever held them accountable for that promise. So here they go again promising to fund a wall so they can get what they want. In my day we call people that promised to do something for us and didn't DO IT LIARS!

Anonymous said...

Loren, here is some food for thought.

Skin in the game and being able to vote.

What does 'skin in the game' look like?

Basically citizen taxpayers or property owners not on the public teat have ‘skin in the game’. That excludes public sector employees as they get their wages from private sector taxes and have a vested interest in more govt. power. We could possibly make exceptions for the military and first responders as they put their lives on the line in exchange for wages from private sector taxes.

Retirees that have paid into the system and have investment income/retirement accounts have ‘skin in the game’ and should be able to vote.

People on the govt. hand out system in whatever form it may take would not qualify. Mom and dad paying for your medical insurance until you are 26? You don’t get to vote. Again exceptions can be made for the military etc.

Point of clarification here. There is a difference between entitlements and hand outs. For example; social security is an entitlement....IF you paid into it in good faith for your whole career you are entitled to that money as the government originally promised. A forced retirement account so to speak. Actually you paid into it a gunpoint but that's another issue. It's not the fault of those recipients of Social inSecurity that the govt. has stolen and continues to steal it and gives it to folks that did not contribute. They spend it on other things too.

EBT cards, free cell phones, free health care, section eight housing etc.? Those are handouts and those receiving that type of largess should not be able to vote.

Want to vote? Get off the dole and get a real job.

And don't give me crap about public sector employees pay taxes too. They pay with wages gotten by taxing the private sector. So for those of you in the private sector, you not only make it possible for pubic sector employees to pay taxes, YOUR tax dollars also pay for their grocery bills, house payments or rent, college tuition, car payments, life insurance, that nice RV or boat in the driveway, dinner out with the wifey and more. And what do you get in return? Been to the DMV lately? Happy about that?

It used to be that folks went into public service for the benefits which were above those of the private sector in exchange for a slightly decreased wage. Public sector unions have changed all that and now the scales have tipped the other way with .gov jobs paying more than a lot of equivalent private sector ones and have even better benefits than before.

“When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”—Benjamin Franklin

We're there now.

Somewhere Behind Enemy Lines
People's Republik of Kommifornistan