No, really, we said from the outset this idiotic rush to prosecute persecute Baldwin was asinine, recockulous, contra-factual, prejudicially bile-based rather than fact-based, contrary to basic jurisprudence, and probably wouldn't go well if tried.
Hmm. How curious. I'm sure it's not true. I mean, what prosecution team has half their staff kick themselves off the trial, and 80% of the weight of their charges thrown out before they even get to trial, because they don't understand basic legal principles in place for centuries? And this is the assclown posse some of the peanut gallery is cheering for.
They're rooting against a guy who shot two people, on behalf of a prosecution team that keeps shooting itself in the foot, over and over. Life is funny sometimes. And you may still get your most heartfelt wishes to come true, despite the prosecution trying mightily to screw this pooch so hard it'll never walk straight again, before the trial even starts.
Maybe the law works differently in New Mexico than it does in the rest of the country. Or maybe they shouldn't hire prosecutors who went to a combination Law School, Dog Kennel, and Beautician Academy. Just a hunch.
7 comments:
Well, it IS New Mexico. The state gubment is and has been demoncrats for 90 years.
Also, as to intellect; NM is rated last in education of the 50 states. So, there ya go.
That is so cute how anyone thought that comrade Baldwin would be in any trouble.
An esteemed CPUSA party member is above the law at all times.
John Wayne wasn't at Iwo Jima.
He's under indictment for manslaughter; I'ma go out on a limb and call that "trouble".
The reason he's probably going to come out okay has nothing to do with his politics, but rather with the facts that
a) the prosecution is composed of complete morons, and
b) Baldwin is legally blameless for what happened.
Bummer for the Butthurt Brigade, but there it is.
The Germans didn't bomb Pearl Harbor either, but that didn't stop Blutto from motivating Delta House, and being funnier than you.
Next you're going to tell us dogs can't run companies, cats and tigers don't talk, and you'll try to suck all the fun and wisdom out of Dilbert, Garfield, and Calvin and Hobbes, right?
What do you make of reports that the involved weapon "was destroyed"?
The FBI damaged the gun during their investigation of it? The “most elite” criminal organization…oops, criminal investigation organization in the world damaged evidence so badly it may not be admissible?
I’m torn between calling this a clown court or kangaroo court.
@Anon 6:12P,
The weapon wasn't destroyed, but apparently the ham-fisted mooks at the FBI Crime Lab buggered it up so badly that's it cannot be relied upon to prove anything of a mechanical nature, which is yet another shot by the prosecution into its own feet.
Maybe they're better beauticians ?
Post a Comment