"It's over, people."
It was made in reference to the excerpt of a line from a World Health Organization COVID-19 statement.
The excerpted section is as follows:
"a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable."
Sounds great when you only read that little part, right?
Berenson is under the misimpression that WHO is throwing in the towel on vaxxing the world to freedom.
As I heard time and time again from a Baptist preacher and theologian who was a Navy chaplain on the beach at Iwo Jima on the first day of that battle, "Text without a context is a pretext." Meaning exactly what Shakespeare said in The Merchant Of Venice: "The devil can cite scripture for his purpose."
I bring this up, because Berenson was so fixated on what he wanted to hear, he missed what WHO actually said. Here is the entire paragraph from that excerpt (¶7):
"With near- and medium-term supply of the available vaccines, the need for equity in access to vaccines across countries to achieve global public health goals, programmatic considerations including vaccine demand, and evolution of the virus, a vaccination strategy based on repeated booster doses of the original vaccine composition is unlikely to be appropriate or sustainable."
IOW, the only reason they don't want to keep using the same vaxx again and again and again, endlessly, is because
a) it manifestly doesn't work (especially for variants 1 through XX, thus far)
b) there isn't enough of it to go around, worldwide
c) first world countries are hogging the supplies, because they can afford to buy it
d) TPTB at WHO are eagerly awaiting a plethora of new Frankenvaxxes any minute!
Don't take my word for it; read it for yourself:
"The TAG-CO-VAC considers that COVID-19 vaccines that have high impact on prevention of infection and transmission, in addition to the prevention of severe disease and death, are needed and should be developed. Until such vaccines are available, as as the SARS-CoV-2 virus evolves, the composition of current COVID-19 vaccines may need to be updated, to ensure that COVID-19 vaccines continue to provide WHO-recommended levels of protection against infection and disease  by VOCs, including Omicron and future variants.
The TAG-CO-VAC will consider a change in vaccine composition:
to ensure that vaccines continue to meet the criteria established in WHO's Target Product Profile for COVID-19 vaccines, including protection against severe disease
to improve vaccine-induced protection.
To that aim, COVID-19 vaccines need to:
be based on strains that are genetically and antigenically close to the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variant(s);
in addition to protection against severe disease and death, be more effective in protection against infection thus lowering community transmission and the need for stringent and broad-reaching public health and social measures;
elicit immune responses that are broad, strong, and long-lasting in order to reduce the need for successive booster doses.
In line with this approach, there are many options to consider:
a monovalent vaccine that elicits an immune response against the predominant circulating variant(s), although this option faces the challenge of the rapid emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants and the time needed to develop a modified or new vaccine;
a multivalent vaccine containing antigens from different SARS-CoV-2 VOCs;
a pan SARS-CoV-2 vaccine: a more sustainable long-term option that would effectively be variant-proof."
And while they're up, I'd also like a pony, the winning Powerball ticket, and the home phone number of the Playmate Of The Year, since we're pulling wishes out of our underpants.
And until the COVID Tooth Fairy and Big Pharma deliver those magical unicorn vaxxes pooping strawberry-scented wonderfulness on all mankind, and peace rules the planets?
"You're all my bitchez, bitchez!" - WHO, CDC, and TPTB
Read. The. WHOLE. Thing. It's a one-page five-minute read, and it lays out the whole long-term plan from WHO, at this point.
What they did admit there, left-handedly, is that the current crop of poisons does none of those things, while they're simultaneously openly salivating at the prospect of many, many more vaxxes, which they hope might actually be worthy of the name "vaccine".
Whether they'll have the same witch's brew of lethal and/or permanently debilitating side effects (death, heart attacks, strokes, blindness, paralysis, etc.) as the current DNA germ warfare versions isn't even part of their concern or discussion set. Be afraid. Be very afraid. They think what they've done so far has "worked", and they want to do it again, "MOAR! BIGGER! HARDER!"
That's a far cry from "It's over, people." Where we are on this is here:
They have not yet BEGUN to vaxx.
This is why it's both dangerous, and bordering on foolishly stupid, to ignore the full context of the discussion (especially when they print it in English right in front of your face), and that before you declare victory, to be sure to tell the enemy. He always gets a vote.
Our common enemies have spoken, and the worldwide Vaxxapalooza is no such "over". Sorry if that's news to anyone.
What you've seen to date was just the first inning. And it's going to be a loooooong ballgame.