Thursday, March 20, 2025

Fight Fire With Napalm, Following By Nuking From Orbit

 8 US Code 1324:

(A) Any person who---

(i)
knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii)
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such violation of law;
(iii)
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;
(iv)
encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law; or
(v)
(I)
engages in any conspiracy to commit any of the preceding acts, or
(II)
aids or abets the commission of any of the preceding acts,
shall be punished as provided in subparagraph (B).
(B)A person who violates subparagraph (A) shall, for each alien in respect to whom such a violation occurs—
(i)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i) or (v)(I) or in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), or (iv) in which the offense was done for the purpose of commercial advantage or private financial gain, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;
(ii)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both;
(iii)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both; and
(iv)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both.


By my reading of the above statute, federal judge Boasberg, in attempting to hinder the deportation of violent criminal aliens, and continue to harbor them in the United States, has committed about 50 serious federal felonies.

As there is no "king's X" provision allowing federal judges to commit serial felonies in the course and scope of their employment, President Trump should direct the Attorney General to send federal marshals to arrest Judge Boasberg. and refer him to the appropriate US Attorney for prosecution under this section of federal code.,and under as many counts as pertain directly to his rulings.

That should keep Judge Shitforbrains too busy to issue any more jackassical rulings or injunctions, and expedite his impeachment for cause and removal from the federal bench, on his way to federal Supermax.

Start charging federal judges for the crimes they're committing, and this bogus lawfare being directed at Trump will disappear like ice cubes in a sauna. For that matter, tasing a couple and dragging them out of federal court by the hair should curb their enthusiasm for recent shananigans in about 0.2 seconds.

And be delightful to watch.

It's high time the rogue members of the federal judiciary learned about the limits of their power. With a smartly-applied choke chain, and a cattle prod to the rectum for encouragement.

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Rope. In public.

Anonymous said...

Damned good idea.
Can he serve on the bench if he's a convicted felon? Besides the whole 'good-standing' thing, isn't there some clause about it in the bar association?

Anonymous said...

I watched a clip last night of Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller complaining about all of the lawsuits and injunctions being tossed into the way of Trump's policy decisions, especially as regards illegals aliens and deportations.

My thought was where was this guy with law suits against Bribem when Bribem was FLYING ILLEGALS INTO THE COUNTRY IN THE DEAD OF NIGHT after this attempt to evade scrutiny was discovered? Surely the same statute should have applied to this blatantly illegal activity.

Nemo

Anonymous said...

I completely agree and I'm sure Slam Blondie will be right on it. Probably already is. . . In the background. . . Trust the plan. . .

Johnny Paytoilet said...

I started voting back in 1972. You've given me a good reason never to do it again.

Landroll said...

Seems like the law should work for the Swells on the boards of the NGOs and the operating officers of the NGOs also. We can only hope there is the will to do it.

Dan said...

There is no shortage of laws and no shortage of evidence showing multiple violations of these laws by countless leftists both in government and in other capacities. What's lacking are charges, arrests, perp walks. And I'm not holding my breath waiting for them. Because they are unlikely to happen.

Anonymous said...

Well,
this covers about every NGO involved in immigration:
"
(i)knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
"
a person should have recourse through this for any personal damages whatsoever as a result of an illegal alien being carted into their AO?

Trumpeter said...

Yes, yes, yes! Now do Catholic Charities and the Lutherans!

DWEEZIL THE WEASEL said...

You are right on the money, Mr. Aesop. Now let's see if this happens. I will not make any bets. And as I have posted on other sites, if Ms. Bondi and Mr. Patel do not get their act together and promote the justice which I and others crave, then it will be new boss same as old boss. I am giving them until 06/30/2025 to at least start the ball rolling. Stay safe in SoCal. Bleib ubrig. -DTW

SoCoRuss said...

And yet with all the laws that state the facts they still do it. Why, you say. Because they get away with it every time and always will. The MIGA messiah and his merry band are just more political theater for the stupid sheeple being led to slaughter.

maruadventurer said...

Not one Iota of disagreement. Its why Bondi ought to be kicking the Solicitor Generals ass right now to force SCOTUS to act. Roberts would sit on his throne fat dumb and happy till someone gets a rise out of Alito or Thomas.

Anonymous said...

And don't stop there; there's a congressional delegation that has and continues to commit treason.

teej2009 said...

This right here. Yesterday.

Anonymous said...

They gotta learn to stay in their own lane. Make an example, Pam Bondi.

George said...

I read on a blog that I cannot re-find at this moment that there is a 1948 Supreme Court decision regarding the interference of lower court judges with the executive branch.. It concluded that they had no standing with the executive branch. A better mind than mind could probably find it.

B Woodman said...

Video record it and air it on a publicly accessible social network (X?). Put it on a 24 hour loop. Charge a small nominal fee, and VOILA! the FedGov debt is paid.
Toxic Deplorable B Woodman

Lord of the Fleas said...

Very nice idea, there. Although given that we're all still waiting for the entire BoD from Tyson Foods to get frog-marched out of the boardroom and into the dock, I'm not holding my breath.

There are, however, a couple other arrows that the Trump team have in their quiver that might be worth of consideration.

Constitution Art 3 Section 1: "The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behavior..." Usurpation of Executive powers doesn't qualify as good behavior in most peoples' books. I did see a reference once (can't find it) that such removal can be done by a simple majority (not 2/3) of House and Senate. (I guess the difference is that formal impeachment is a DQ for re-appointment where removal for misbehavior isn't.) But it's a thought.

And the other is 8a U.S. Code Court Rule 65 - (c)Security.
"The court may issue a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order only if the movant gives security in an amount that the court considers proper to pay the costs and damages sustained by any party found to have been wrongfully enjoined or restrained. The United States, its officers, and its agencies are not required to give security."

Note that this is mandatory, yet it never seems to be done. But I hear the Trump team is raising this matter (they shouldn't have to), so we may see some improvement just due to that.

Anyhoo, I'm all for the charges for aiding and abetting. Always nice to see the shoe on the other foot.

Allen said...

from what I have been reading, there were 3 among that lot that should not have been deported. one was a pro soccer player legally in the US to play soccer, who was deported over his "madrid" tattoo, which is where he is from. I'm not saying don't deport, but we should be doing proper follow through on the paperwork before they are removed, in case we are making a mistake.

also, we need to be aware that the left is currently filing away for future use that it is really easy to remove non-citizens. expect penalties for future infractions of the left's dogma to include loss of citizenship and deportation.

JustTheFacts said...

"The first Trump administration from 2017 to 2021, faced, by my count, I believe, it was 65 so-called nationwide injunctions, which, by the way, is more than the first 44 presidents of the United States combined, literally in all of American history, faced there."

"President Trump, in less than two months, has faced 129 legal challenges by activist judges. Only two cases are closed."

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/judicial-insurrection-radical-leftist-judges-wage-all-war/

Aesop said...

Trump's Solicitor General should issue an opinion that no federal district or appellate court has jurisdiction over the Executive Branch, only SCOTUS does.

And then act that way.

This will bring an end to this nonsense in short order.
Secondarily, as noted, start arresting and prosecuting federal judges for federal crimes.

Nothing plants your ass back on planet earth faster than having your delusions of deity parked in jail under indictment.

Tucanae Services said...

George, here ya go --

Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)

Case Citation: Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U.S. 160 (1948)
Synopsis: In Ludecke v. Watkins, the Supreme Court addressed the application of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 in the context of deporting a German national after World War II. The Court held that the president retains the authority to deport alien enemies under the act even after the cessation of active hostilities, as long as a formal peace treaty has not been signed or the president has not determined that hostilities have concluded. The case involved Kurt Ludecke, a German alien who was detained in 1941 and ordered deported in 1946. Ludecke challenged the deportation, arguing that the war had ended, but the Court ruled 5-4 against him, emphasizing that the determination of when a war ends is a political question for the executive branch, not the judiciary. The decision underscored the broad discretion granted to the president under the Alien Enemies Act during times of war or national emergency.

Tucanae Services said...

Want a permanent end to the asylum madness? Change where it occurs.

Specifically, the US only grants asylum to persons who apply to a US consulate or embassy in their Country of Origin. All adjudication as to granting, deploying or challenging a asylum request must occur in the Country of Origin. Any attempts to other than their Country of Origin is immediate dismissal and subject to immediate deportation.

Yes Congress would need to change the naturalization laws. But the change would solve much. Fewer cases of course as not many US attorneys would want to sit in a flea bag hotel in Botswana. USCIS job is easier as they don't have to fool with catch 'n release. And 'oh the humanity', but of course, no longer would someone have to brave the Darien Gap to get her. If they do, it was for naught.

Aesop said...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M4TfFTmITLo