Monday, March 31, 2025

Another Biff Tannen Award Winner

h/t WRSA

Anonymous memester: Award certificate available in stall #3 of local men's room.
Wipe for picture.









As usual, WRSA has a great collection of memes today, as it does most every day. And as usual, the one in the left half of the header is not one of them. The better ones, OTOH, are much better. This one never should have made the cut.

We suppose math is not the creator's strong suit. This is what happens when Common Core drop-outs try to meme.

If you post enough memes from other people, you're going to keep scraping the bottom of the barrel. In this example, we have the Trifecta Of Stupid:

1) Not remotely true. (Srsly? Three names: Mao. Stalin. Hitler. Israel doesn't even make the medal round.)

2) Thus not effective, except as a dog whistle for people who see JOOOOOOOOOOOOS! everywhere, including under their own bed. JDS is real.

3) So sadly pathetic that the memester responsible (too chickenshit to sign their work, as always) had to hijack another protest, and use a black man to carry the KKK's water for them. Apparently it's not as good when someone in a white pointed hood is holding the sign so childishly altered. Who knew? Award x2 multiplier for Bad Photoshop.

We wouldn't bother recognizing such retarded children artworks, but those fish in the barrel aren't going to shoot themselves.

9 comments:

Rhea said...

The ones Planned Parenthood kills don't count as kids because thier parents didn't want them. Those are 'clumps of cell' not children. /s (because I know how biology actually works.)

For real though, the JDS is out of line and needs to be stopped. It never seems to occur to these clowns that if [Israel hating Muslim group here] didn't start nothin,' there wouldn't be nothin.' It also escapes thier clever notice that America is number 2 on the hate list for said Muslim groups so maybe stop giving aid and comfort to America's enemies.

~Rhea

Jess said...

You can't fix stupid, but you can create a meme to celebrate it.

Anonymous said...

Interesting, isn't it, how the left claims to be 'anti-fascist' and 'anti-Nazi', yet hates Jews with a fervency the OG fascists & Nazis couldn't even approach?

Anonymous said...

Fred in Texas, not a fan of Israel (not a hater either), Muslim fanatics, Catholic pedophile priests, inner City diversity or anybody with a political science degree. All of those groups have a much higher percentage of social pathologies. Individually, I'll judge no man (or woman) but as demographic groups they leave a lot to be desired for a socially healthy society.
Remus was correct about crowds. And those groups in crowds create more problems than they solve.
Do an Internet search for government officials with dual American and Israeli citizenship. See also: USS Liberty. Muslims... Enough said. Catholic pedophile priests are a nasty stain on the largest religious organization in the world. Also reference socialist paradigm of the Pope. African American... Pick a side no man can serve two matters. Either be an African or an American. Also, statistics is another fact of mathematics. Liars can figure but figures didn't lie... Political science degrees or a degree in jurisprudence and/or membership in a state bar association is to my reckoning a strong indicator of sociopathy. Again, statistics is another face of math. Lol at the track record of those groups.

John Wilder said...


Yup.

Aesop said...

"Any man who judges by the group is a peawit. You take men one at a time." 1st Sgt. Buster Kilrain, Gettysburg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nV2-09nIdzQ

Allen said...

@aesop I prefer lemmy, but you do you...

"I don’t understand racism, I never understood it. I can’t understand the fact you could hate somebody from half a mile away and never even speak to them and hate them. That’s fucking so dumb. There are black assholes, white assholes, Japanese assholes, whatever assholes… there’s always plenty of assholes. But until you speak to people, you never know which they are, a good guy or an asshole. Give ’em that chance. That’s the only thing I’m prejudiced against, that’s assholes."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTPSmHPiPko

Skyler the Weird said...

If they hadn't been aborted, the Feminist West wouldn't be importing Hottentots and Toltecs to replace them. This is the true Great Replacement.

Peter B said...

In 2000, Michael Oren, who served as Israel's ambassador to the US, took advantage of documents then recently declassified. He wrote:

"there is no indication in the archives that the Israelis were troubled by the Liberty, much less considered it worthy of attack. Indeed, there is no evidence that anyone in the Israeli government, or the IDF Chief of Staff, knew of the ship’s presence at all. . . .

. . . The release of hitherto classified papers on the incident, however, now enables us to dispel spurious theories about the incident, and to conclude that Israel’s assault upon the USS Liberty was a tragic error, and nothing more. In light of the new documents, it is now possible to reconstruct the chain of mishaps on the part of both sides that led to the unintended Israeli attack.

The incident began with the ill-conceived decision to send the Liberty to the crisis-torn Middle East, a mere half-mile beyond Egyptian waters, in an area not used by commercial shipping and which Nasser had declared offlimits to neutral vessels. The Americans did not accede to Chief of Staff Rabin’s request for the identification of all U.S. ships in the area or Ambassador Harman’s request for a strategic liaison between Israel and the Sixth Fleet. The Liberty’s dispatchers [the Liberty was nominally under the 6th Fleet, but in reality was controlled by the JCS and the NSA,] meanwhile, overrode naval orders to keep the ship in Spain, and then failed to inform the U.S. attaché in Tel Aviv of its presence near the war zone. These mistakes were compounded by the navy’s communications system, which delayed by as much as two days orders to the Liberty to withdraw 100 miles from the coast. Even after it was hit, the Americans had difficulty locating the Liberty, the JCS placing it at “60-100 miles north of Egypt.” If neither Castle, nor [CINCEUR] nor even the President of the United States could know where the Liberty was, it seems unreasonable to expect that the Israelis, in the thick of battle, should have been able to locate it.

"The Israelis, too, committed their own share of fateful errors, as the Yerushalmi report points out: The erroneous reports of bombardment at El Arish [massive explosions in an Israeli ammo dump that later turned out to be accidental rather than enemy action,] the failure to replace the Liberty’s marker on the board after it had been cleared, the over-eagerness of naval commanders, and worst of all, Ensign Yifrah’s miscalculation of the ship’s speed [he thought it was doing about 30 knots, which USS Liberty couldn't do.] Though Yerushalmi’s report suggested reasons for these errors—inflexible naval procedures, the inaccuracy of speed-measuring devices—one is still left with a sense of poor organization and sloppy execution. Moreover, there were breakdowns in communications between the Israeli navy and air force stemming from inadequate command structure and the immense pressures of a multi-front war. To these factors must be added Israel’s general sensitivity about its coastal defenses, and the exhaustion of its pilots after four days of uninterrupted combat. Yet none of these amount to the kind of gross negligence of which the Israelis have been accused.

"And then there were “bad breaks” that are unfortunately commonplace in war: The U.S. planes that were called back because of their nuclear payload (their mere presence might have warded off the torpedo boats); the Liberty’s inability to signal the approaching Israeli boats, and the machine gunner who fired on them; and the smoke that hid the identities of both the attackers and the attacked.

"All of these elements combined to create a tragic “friendly fire” incident of the kind that claimed the lives of at least fifty Israeli soldiers in the Six Day War, and caused 5,373 American casualties in Vietnam in 1967 alone."
Note: emphasis and comments in square brackets added. The original can be found at
https://azure.org.il/download/magazine/1652az9_oren.pdf