ABC agrees to eat shit, pay Trump $16M, kiss his ass publicly, and apologize for lying about him
Next up? Well, hopefully, Trump's lawyers sue the coven over at The Spew.
Any settlement with them should include the requirement that at the beginning of every show for the next four years, they have to stand, face toward Washington D.C., place their right hands over their shriveled little hearts, and say "Hail President Trump The Magnificent! May he Make America Great Again!"
If Court TV puts the trial on pay-per-view, they could earn enough money to buy CNN and MSNBC, with change left over.
14 comments:
Tired of Winning, not anytime soon.
This is a positive development, but what should have been stipulated is that the apology needed to be aired on prime time teevee prior to each airing of ABC's "news" shows rather than appended to an online article written in March 2024 which no one will read and will soon be lost in the morass of the innertubes.
Prior comment was not meant to be anonymous.
Just a simple Pledge of Allegiance at the beginning of every show with participation from the studio audience would do.
We need to hold him accountable for his promises.
Absolutely, yes.
Way off topic but here goes. What the hell is happening with all this anti-Jooo crap we're being propagandized with at certain otherwise newsworthy blogs like WRSA? I know we can just skim past it but it's starting to get me really pissed off. I know, don't like it, don't read it. But at some point you start losing respect for our side. Almost makes me wonder if there's a left wing mole trying disrupt and destroy from the inside. Or are there really that many fucking Nazis on our side? If so, I'll start being the mole who causes shit. You know what I mean? Yeah I'm that pissed.
Off subject. Aesop, I just (10:15ish Tennessee time) dropped a, to me, viable nuke theory at BCE's. If you'd spend 5 minutes on it, I'd appreciate it. Even though I think you're a bit biased on some subjects, that doesn't mean I don't respect you're analytical abilities. You barely mentioned nukes at BCE's. You're the best, honest, critic I could think of. Thanks in advance.
Without having read yours, TM, BCE's analysis of the non-viability of missing nukes is spot-on. In short, they rot and fall apart over time, until they become worthless, except as the working parts for dirty bombs.
A 40-year-old iron bomb will still go bang.
A 40-year-old nuke will spark and fizzle. It might even go pop.
What it will not do is render an earth-shattering kaboom.
@Anon 8:13,
Some people are actually afflicted with Nazi-homo.
The froth around the corners of the mouth usually gives them away.
Some others simply can't help themselves. It's a character flaw.
I treat it like people ripping farts in public: Politeness demands that you not notice, and common sense requires that you walk away, ideally upwind.
re usability of missing nukes (attn Tree Mike, hat tip to Aesop) In support of Aesop's accurate brief comment, recall Tom Clancy's "Sum of All Fears" in which that scenario is the story. Bad guys find missing nuke. Have to rebuild it to use it. Requires not only some very sophisticated atomic awareness/skills, but also some reasonably available instruments, some not so trivial machine tools, these latter two needing significant operator skills. Point: even if one knows the drift, still takes a considerable amount of practical skills and industrial infrastructure to accomplish. And, in this story, Clancy brilliantly (as is usual for him) captures the ironic nuances. A very, very minor detail--failing to account for the radioactive decay in the *remanufactured/purified* critical mass and resultant presence of daughter isotopes--turns the bomb (in 3 shakes of a lamb's tail) into a very big firecracker which, while damaging enough to cook those in a sports arena and distribute some nasty radioactive waste, does not make sunshine.
It's interesting that Jack Ryan served two non consecutive terms as POTUS in the non Clancy novels.
If you say so. I never read any of the non-Clancy novels, and find the attempted re-animation of dead authors a morbid attempt at zombie publishing, based on lying people into believing that the deceased author had anything to do with the new title beyond his or her name being involuntarily attached post-mortem.
That's proven disastrous, as a couple of the Michael Crichton outlines and treatments have proven so atrocious that it's obvious why the author left them at the bottom of his file cabinet, never to see the light of day.
The editors and publishers responsible for those travesties ought to be horsewhipped.
Here's another POV on Trump:
http://sillybeliefs.com/blog035.html#blog035-7
I like and agree with a lot of their material(lead engineer at one of my clients turned me onto their site several years ago), but this article was really foam at the mouth.
Thank you, Anon, and thank you, Aesop, for your reply. I rarely rise above lurking, but it’s good to know that other people are bothered by that too.
Post a Comment