Wednesday, November 13, 2024

FIFY

 h/t WRSA




9 comments:

SiGraybeard said...

I'll hazard a guess that number three is child kidnapping for sex slavery, into the Mideast, and the rest of the world. The drug cartels shipping kids across the southern border have taken at least half a million - protected by Mayorkis, Biden, and the current bunch of demons. Which, of course, means they're using our tax money to pimp children.

Anonymous said...

I suspect you are intentionally giving Israel a pass on the death of children

Aesop said...

They don't need any "pass".
Maybe you figured we didn't kill any children when we bombed Japan and Germany in WWII?
And did you think the Vietnamese girl in LIFE magazine's iconic photo was napalmed because she was VC?

Take your white hood off, and you'll see things better.

maruadventurer said...

Modern munitions do not discriminate. Once its on its way anything in the blast radius is DOA. Does not matter, young, old, woke, based, blue, green, black, or white and everyones pronouns are 'messed/up'.

elysianfield said...

Children? How many divisions do THEY have? They are but an ant colony in the path of highway construction. They are the eggs that must be broken to make an omelet. They are up for grabs as we all are. Weep for the Human Condition.

jack said...

So, we got the pass, Israel gets the pass... why not islamists?

Roy Kerns said...

Yeppers re Original Post.

The number of states that passed "kill the kids" bills provides a 'tell' of the future. And demolishes any appeal to Dobbs as having limited abortion. Worshipping Moloch via child sacrifice has never proved good for a nations long-range survival.

OBTW, love your 7:57 AM response to Anon, Aesop. You continue to inspire me with your on-target snark riposte's.

Warren V. DeCee said...

Tu Quoque, followed by Ad Hominem.

Aesop said...

@jack,
Because unlike Islamists, neither we nor Israel set out with the intention of killing children. Mens rea is the difference between manslaughter and murder. The former is accidental and unintentional, the latter is anything but.

If this needs be explained to you as to a child, perhaps there is a glaring lack in your education to this point in life.

@Warren,
Cute, but erroneous.
The original argument was based on pure ad hoc, ergo propter hoc, Guilt By Association, and ad hominem.
I fight fire with fire.

And what you call ad hominem, I identify as "calling a spade a spade".
Truth is always an absolute defense against a charge of slander.
QED

Better luck next outing.