Saturday, September 27, 2025

No, By All Means, Move

h/t WRSA







5 comments:

CT Ginger said...

With nothing to my credit but ten years teaching martial arts and a third dan black belt, let me observe the obvious. It is abundantly clear that one can win a fight and still get seriously injured. If you’ve ever seen a heavy weight boxing match go the full 12 rounds, trust me. Both the winner and the loser go to the hospital after the fight. Dont be eager for a shooting war.

Jess said...

I think too many people don't realize how history shows the terrorist activities of those that follow Marx, and Lenin, always leads to a showdown involving violence. The U.S. is there, and with Trump mobilizing National Guard troops to the West Coast to handle the problem, the shooting will intensify, and the attempt to overthrow the government will be in full force.

danielbarger said...

The left has only one rule. WIN! By any means necessary.

Aesop said...

No one sane imagines that even a victory will be cost-free.

I'm thus anything but "eager" for a shooting war.

But imagining it is avoidable, at this point, is bordering on delusional.

So while by no means being eager for any such thing, I recognize its absolute inevitability.
Those two things are not the same thing.

So the question is not about avoiding "politics by other means".
The question is knowing the certainty of armed conflict, how ought our side go about making victory as inevitable as the conflict itself.

"Every battle is won before it is ever fought." - Sun Tzu

Knowing that, the key imperative is to place our side firmly on the victorious side in the preparation and strategy columns, against the day when the inevitable becomes the actual.

Our side has a lot of natural advantages, but we are in no wise where we need to be, knowing that the republic is rushing towards violent calamity at the speed of sound, if not the speed of light.

John said...

That's the only way it can end.