 |
| Make Insurrection And Sedition Penalties Great Again |
(a) A person who is a national of the United States whether by birth or naturalization, shall lose his nationality by voluntarily performing any of the following acts with the intention of relinquishing United States nationality—
...
(7)committing any act of treason against, or attempting by force to overthrow, or bearing arms against, the United States, violating or conspiring to violate any of the provisions of section 2383 of title 18, or willfully performing any act in violation of section 2385 of title 18, or violating section 2384 of title 18 by engaging in a conspiracy to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, if and when he is convicted thereof by a court martial or by a court of competent jurisdiction.
For the link-impaired those three sections are Rebellion and Insurrection, Overthrow, and Seditious Conspiracy against the United States.
Everyone attempting to hinder ICE raids, or vehicles and government agents undertaking them, qualifies under those provisions, under 18 USC §2383:
Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
So the government is perfectly justified in declaring martial law, rounding up anyone who does so in the future, and finding them at a court martial guilty, stripping them of their American citizenship, and shipping them to Gitmo, as upon conviction they lose all rights of US citizenship, and the Constitution and its protections no longer apply to them.
The rest of 8 USC §1481 helpfully notes that anyone who performs any such act is considered to have done so voluntarily, and performing the acts renders one guilty under that statute until proven innocent. Literally. So getting rounded up at such an incident justifies stripping you of your US citizenship, putting you in prison with other non-citizens, and sentencing you to death, in short order. Yes, really. One declaration from POTUS, and we could be shipping people to Gitmo and hanging them by Friday!
That could even be applied to Gov. Gabbin' Nuisance, L.A.'s derelict and full communist Mayor Karen Basshole, and any federal judge who attempts to stick their nose into the government's business.
As a bonus, the president, without let or hindrance from anyone else, can unilaterally declare martial law in Los Angeles or any other city similarly besieged UFN, which takes the entire purview of the subsequent business out of the jurisdiction of both the federal courts and the DoJ, leaving weak sisters like Kash Patel and Pam Bondi - not to mention 677 federal district judges - wholly irrelevant to further activities, and puts the chain of command directly from the president to SecDef Hegseth and the military tribunals the designated local commander establishes, putting the entire area under the jurisdiction of the UCMJ, which treats sedition rather harshly, under Article 94. The time to appeal any decisions out of the military trial system to where civilian authorities could have a say could be accounted in years, by which time whole swaths of former US citizens could already be sentenced. Or worse.
BTW, any such citizenship-stripping act merits 10 years in federal prison, but sedition, which is any action of violence or disturbance against the civil authorities, adjudicated by a military court martial, can be used to invoke the death penalty.
Be still, my beating heart! We could skip Air Pinochet, and just go with gibbets in ranks ten abreast.
Pour encourager les autres.
13 comments:
The amount of “muh January 6th iz treesin!” squealing would reach a fever pitch; the popcorn industry is going to make a killing.
Well said. Now if we can get the PTB to move on it.
And yet the Messiah and his minions wont do it. They are puppets to the same masters as the Democommies. Realize the rules and laws don't apply to the left or criminals or illegals anymore but they are enforced strictly on the right since the right wont do or say ANYTHING to stop it. So why even bring it up.? The collapse continues unabated. The war was over before it even began and with nothing but a whimper. The sheeple of the right will ask even politely to be allowed to send a strongly worded letter to congress as they are put in boxcars to be sent to the death camps while their kids are transitioned and become sex slaves.
Our system is broken and cant or wont be fixed, might as well admit it.
A total collapse or WW 3 or SMOD or pole shift is the only thing that could even possibly force this country to change anything so bring that shit on because nothing else evidently will.
But we all know it ain't gonna happen. No one in WasteDC, including Trump, has the intestinal fortitude to essentially start the full fledged shooting CW2. Because that's what would happen. The left would go hot, then the right would go hotter and away we go!
8 us code 1481 is NOT Constitutional as in it is our RIGHT to alter or ABOLISH a government that no longer serves the interest of its citizens!....It is my Constitutional DUTY to NULLIFY statutes that impinge on my freedoms!!....to NOT comply with liberty destroying legalisms
Personally I like 18 U.S. Code § 1964 - Civil remedies, provisions under RICO. Only because we can all get in on the action/compensation. Pretty clear that what is about to transpire on June 14th is coordinated. Would make a nice RICO case. Strip them of all their funding right down to the skivvies.
"... --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it ..." -- Declaration of Independence.
I would consider it an interesting hour to hear a Clarence Thomas or Samuel Alito square the DoI against US Title 18 law on insurrection.
Dear Intellectual Chew Toy,
Since it's "unconstitutional", you won't mind being asked to kindly lay your finger on the section of the US Constitution that specifies that wholly imaginary "right". When you find it, quote if for the class.
When you fail at that simple task, go and punch your civics teacher and high school principal in the throat for failing to teach you properly regarding Constitutional basics, and for letting you graduate with the egregiously wrong Common Core misimpression that your feels equal black-letter law.
Also, it may have escaped your notice (hardly surprising, really) but all law and statutes, since Ever "impinge upon your freedoms", which is exactly the point, and why "governments are instituted among men". (That phrase may ring a bell somewhere in the recesses of your mind. (I'm speaking loosely here.) Maybe, having failed at the specific task of showing us where your imaginary constitutional "right" to rebel exists within it, you could explain to us which laws don't "impinge on your freedoms". You can test this reality at your leisure, for your own education, at no charge, solely to expand your mind. Maybe start with the Code of Hammurabi, then move on to the Ten Commandments, and work your way forward through Magna Carta and so on until you get to 1790 or so, and explain which laws don't "impinge upon your freedoms". It will only be painful the first few times. Then maybe have a look at your state's statutes, and continue the exercise until you hear a great popping sound. Calling you simple, after pointing out that wee flaw in your faulty understanding of all of law itself since ever, is to insult simpletons.
It pains me to point this out, but you're sadly no brighter than the people setting cars on fire last weekend, but at least you're not afraid to not only own the left end of the IQ bell curve, but to build a deck and swimming pool there, whether you meant to or not.
ROWYBS.
If you would better yourself, and save years of embarrassment, perhaps suss out the meaning of the phrase "the Constitution is not a suicide pact", realize how your misimpression turns that concept on its head, and perhaps someday grow your legal understanding to the size of a grain of black pepper. Baby steps.
The rest of you, don't help him. You can't grow a seedling by pulling on it. Let him do the work himself, or it will never take.
Deport, deport, deport, and when we're tired of deporting, deport some more.
At this point I would like to use real bullets on them. As Ted says in a book(Going Home series) I like, Fuck 'em, schwack 'em.
IANAL, either, but I had a thought the other day.
First, the citizenship status of most of the "protestors" is questionable at best, which means they are foreign nationals in our territory.
Second, the president of Mexico stated she was willing to mobilize the Mexican army to protect the protestors - or rather, protect the remittance money they send back.
Therefore, the US is currently the subject of an invasion, with the financial and material support of a foreign state.
If Congress were to use that as a cassus belli and declare war on Mexico, it would allow a proper "gloves off" ROE and the Army and Marines would start filling body bags.
As a bonus, any illegal immigrant in the nation would be considered an out of uniform combatant and subject to summary execution under the Geneva Convention.
Well, I suppose there's no harm in daydreaming.
I feel like that will only be a lasting solution once the fence on the Southern border rivals the fence Egypt put up to keep the Gamazans out.
Rhea
Dear Anonymous, yes, the Declaration of Independence says you have the right to alter or abolish a government that violates your rights. But the same men who wrote that were also keenly aware that the penalty they would suffer for failing to *succeed* at altering or abolishing that government was death. No government is going to go easily into that good night, tyrannical government least of all. If you think the laws against sedition and insurrection are unconstitutional, well, you're entitled to your opinion, but I'd like you to point any government, anywhere, at any time that didn't punish such behavior just as severely.
It's more fundamental than that, MJ.
Anonymous can't tell the difference between the DoI and the US Constitution, and has conflated one with the other as if they were interchangeable.
This is what happens when you get a Common Core education, and confuse it with an actual one.
Post a Comment