Kind Of Undoes That Narrative

h/t American Thinker

Some have pooped on the idea that Patsy Sayoc might have had some help in his supposed faux-bomb campaign, or that he could be anything but a dedicated but hapless moron.

Cheerfully edited out of the narrative is this nugget of exact quotation, from the lawyer that's represented Sayoc in the past on other criminal charges:

"He never seems sophisticated enough to do something like he's accused of.  I wouldn't be surprised to find out that there were others others [sic] who helped prod or encouraged him to do this, or that the bombs in fact were so crudely made, they never could have worked.  He didn't seem to have the intellectual capacity to plan a conspiracy like this in my opinion."

Nota bene, all you clever unravellers of Truth, that his lawyer isn't saying he wasn't smart enough to do this right, he's point-blank said he wasn't bright enough to start doing it at all.

Yet another data point that explains why, exactly like Vegas, nothing about this narrative seems to fit, nor sounds right.

And most of you in that camp need to remember that two years ago, you were sure Trump's allegation that he was being wiretapped by the FBI was lunacy, too.

So, tell me again, in light of what we know now about Obama, Clinton, Comey, Meuller, Rosenstein, Strzok, Page, Brennan, Ohr, et al :
Exactly how far will the Deep State go to bring down this administration, and how far is TOO FAR, beyond which point they will not go?

I put it to you, based on mountains of obvious facts in evidence, the idea that anything whatsoever is "TOO FAR" is risible.

And a danger to the republic.

It's not Idyllic Fairytale Land here. We're in a fight for the culture and the society, and the other side's oft-expressed motto is BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

If anyone cannot process that reality, either wake the fuck up, or STFU.

UPDATE: From Comments:
Denninger's take on this. Worth reading.