Whoever is managing his meds behind the scenes has their act down pretty well. They'd put Dr. Frankenstein to shame for animating a corpse. But you're spot on that they can't manage what passes for a brain in that wreck. Not even the bugs in his ear can keep him from going off his lines.
from some commentary on https://wearechange.org/after-biden-sparks-global-uproar-with-regime-change-comment-u-s-awkwardly-tries-to-walk-it-back/
I see now that it's too often & too inflammatory AND APPARENTLY SCRIPTED, that it must be DELIBERATE - so that his handlers can deliver their message AND fool the blind by pawning off the offense onto Biden's cognitive deficiencies. Brilliant! but evil
That unintended intel drop, combined with actually tweeting about Regime Change in Russia, is going to end badly for all of us.Either one was bad enough as a stand alone piece of stupidity, but combine the two and do so in quick.succession, and it's a logical to assume that the US is going to go in and go after Putin. Because the only way that US troops could go in without threatening Russia is, MAYBE, as UN peacekeepers, and that would ned UN Security Council approval, which could be vetoed by Russia. Otherwise sending in the 82, would be seen as an attempt at Regime Change. And I seriously doubt that Russia would sit idly by as we built up our forces, as Saddam did, if it becomes obvious that we are going into Ukraine, forget the whole 3D chess ns, because Putin is going to kick the board over and it's game over.
So then what's that going to look like?
Then if it's apparent that a invasion is imminent attack with tactical nukes, take out the ground forces in eastern Europe, and probably EUCom in Stuttgart, NATO command in Brussels, Rhine Main Air Base and and maybe Incirlik, just in case it still has the Tactical Nukes. He would also probably sink any capital NATO vessels in the Black Sea and maybe Eastern Med. Then he will say any retaliation attack will result in his using ICBMs.
As an aside I suspect that he will not go after the US Air assets at RAF Lakenheath, or the RAF bases on Cyprus because a direct attack on the UK could result in the British using their nukes. And attacks on Brussels and Stuttgart would have the additional effect of decapitating the EU.
This is my best case scenario if Putin decides to use his nukes, and why he would do so. It could get much worse, and probably will if something isn't done about 25ting Joe, and quickly. At this point I would prefer my chances with Camela, and that is really saying something.
It would be a horrific event, and be devastating for the Europeans. Which is why I hope that they are screaming at the puppet's strong pullers to get a handle on him.
Just to add to the stupid/scary shit Zhou Bi-Den has said:
Putin’s Use of Chemical Weapons ‘Would Trigger a Response In-Kind,’ Biden Says
1. Since US policy has always been a Nuke=Biological=Chemical, and therefore an attack on US forces with Chemicals earns a Nuke back,
And
2. since the US does not have any offensive chemical or biological weapons (if they've been developed, produced, and integrated into the force (including training and exercising) since the 90's they've been much more carful about the news getting out that I credibly think the US government can accomplish),
He just stated that we've going to Nuke the Russians if they use chemicals in the Ukraine.
If the Nekulturny Chekist believes him, and decides he needs to use Chems in Ukraine, then he may decide, based on that statement: what the hell? Go ahead and open the ball himself and use 'em or lose 'em.
I'm surprised that he isn't talking about how he used to be Vlad's lifeguard and how Vlad would rub his blonde leg hairs. At least that would be safer.
>Which is why I hope that they are screaming at the puppet's strong pullers to get a handle on him.
Rod Dreher commented a couple days back on his blog about how he was at a "National Conservatism" conference in Europe and ran into a Pole who was saying that maybe nuclear war wouldn't be such a bad thing if it would just finally get rid of the Russians.
This might not be a common sentiment but it's not as far out there as you might think.
@ Rollary "a Pole who was saying that maybe nuclear war wouldn't be such a bad thing if it would just finally get rid of the Russians.
This might not be a common sentiment but it's not as far out there as you might think."
Are you kidding? What ever isn't vaporized in the initial nuclear fireballs, the whole rest of the U.S. eastern seaboard from Me to Fl and inland to the Mississippi and the entire west coast inland to the western great plains would be a radioactive ash pile for the next 100,000 years. Then there's the entirety of Europe in the same radioactive ash pile.
That's a good thing? Please, pull your head out of your ass and smell the coffee.
The only way to win a nuclear war is to not play the game.
I promise you that this is not a common sentiment. It probably was some stupid kid - Rod Dreher has a tendency to pick up on such "extremists" and make much more out of it than is real.
In fact the opposite is true: we, Poles, we're rather afraid of WW3. One reason is the Russian "deescalation through escalation" strategy.
Are you kidding? What ever isn't vaporized in the initial nuclear fireballs, the whole rest of the U.S. eastern seaboard from Me to Fl and inland to the Mississippi and the entire west coast inland to the western great plains would be a radioactive ash pile for the next 100,000 years. Then there's the entirety of Europe in the same radioactive ash pile.
--not saying it would be a rose garden, but just pointing out that people still live in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, only 75 years later, which is the only real world examples we have.
Yes, I understand the difference in destructive power of modern weapons. I also remember inspectors being quite surprised by the decrepit state of the USSR's nuclear arsenal. From looking at our own, and the constant care and attention it needs, I don't think the russians have it in them to maintain a massive capability.
No, I don't want even one of any size on my city, or even my continent. But the statement made was kinda hysterical and over the top and doesn't match what we know, or think we know.
What did Obummer say "Never underestimate Joes ability to fuck things up"?
ReplyDeleteNothing like an idiot with matches covered in a room filled with spilled gasoline.
"Leader of the FREE World" indeed.
And Obama is one to talk! Besides, I thought that was him whispering those sweet nothings into Joey Fingers ears?
DeleteMF
Whoever is managing his meds behind the scenes has their act down pretty well. They'd put Dr. Frankenstein to shame for animating a corpse. But you're spot on that they can't manage what passes for a brain in that wreck. Not even the bugs in his ear can keep him from going off his lines.
ReplyDeleteyeah, that's what I thought, too.
ReplyDeletefrom some commentary on https://wearechange.org/after-biden-sparks-global-uproar-with-regime-change-comment-u-s-awkwardly-tries-to-walk-it-back/
I see now that it's too often & too inflammatory AND APPARENTLY SCRIPTED, that it must be DELIBERATE - so that his handlers can deliver their message AND fool the blind by pawning off the offense onto Biden's cognitive deficiencies. Brilliant! but evil
That unintended intel drop, combined with actually tweeting about Regime Change in Russia, is going to end badly for all of us.Either one was bad enough as a stand alone piece of stupidity, but combine the two and do so in quick.succession, and it's a logical to assume that the US is going to go in and go after Putin.
ReplyDeleteBecause the only way that US troops could go in without threatening Russia is, MAYBE, as UN peacekeepers, and that would ned UN Security Council approval, which could be vetoed by Russia.
Otherwise sending in the 82, would be seen as an attempt at Regime Change.
And I seriously doubt that Russia would sit idly by as we built up our forces, as Saddam did, if it becomes obvious that we are going into Ukraine, forget the whole 3D chess ns, because Putin is going to kick the board over and it's game over.
So then what's that going to look like?
Then if it's apparent that a invasion is imminent attack with tactical nukes, take out the ground forces in eastern Europe, and probably EUCom in Stuttgart, NATO command in Brussels, Rhine Main Air Base and and maybe Incirlik, just in case it still has the Tactical Nukes.
He would also probably sink any capital NATO vessels in the Black Sea and maybe Eastern Med.
Then he will say any retaliation attack will result in his using ICBMs.
As an aside I suspect that he will not go after the US Air assets at RAF Lakenheath, or the RAF bases on Cyprus because a direct attack on the UK could result in the British using their nukes.
And attacks on Brussels and Stuttgart would have the additional effect of decapitating the EU.
This is my best case scenario if Putin decides to use his nukes, and why he would do so. It could get much worse, and probably will if something isn't done about 25ting Joe, and quickly. At this point I would prefer my chances with Camela, and that is really saying something.
It would be a horrific event, and be devastating for the Europeans. Which is why I hope that they are screaming at the puppet's strong pullers to get a handle on him.
Just to add to the stupid/scary shit Zhou Bi-Den has said:
ReplyDeletePutin’s Use of Chemical Weapons ‘Would Trigger a Response In-Kind,’ Biden Says
1. Since US policy has always been a Nuke=Biological=Chemical, and therefore an attack on US forces with Chemicals earns a Nuke back,
And
2. since the US does not have any offensive chemical or biological weapons (if they've been developed, produced, and integrated into the force (including training and exercising) since the 90's they've been much more carful about the news getting out that I credibly think the US government can accomplish),
He just stated that we've going to Nuke the Russians if they use chemicals in the Ukraine.
If the Nekulturny Chekist believes him, and decides he needs to use Chems in Ukraine, then he may decide, based on that statement: what the hell? Go ahead and open the ball himself and use 'em or lose 'em.
"This business will get out of control..."
I'm surprised that he isn't talking about how he used to be Vlad's lifeguard and how Vlad would rub his blonde leg hairs. At least that would be safer.
ReplyDelete>Which is why I hope that they are screaming at the puppet's strong pullers to get a handle on him.
ReplyDeleteRod Dreher commented a couple days back on his blog about how he was at a "National Conservatism" conference in Europe and ran into a Pole who was saying that maybe nuclear war wouldn't be such a bad thing if it would just finally get rid of the Russians.
This might not be a common sentiment but it's not as far out there as you might think.
@ Rollary "a Pole who was saying that maybe nuclear war wouldn't be such a bad thing if it would just finally get rid of the Russians.
ReplyDeleteThis might not be a common sentiment but it's not as far out there as you might think."
Are you kidding? What ever isn't vaporized in the initial nuclear fireballs, the whole rest of the U.S. eastern seaboard from Me to Fl and inland to the Mississippi and the entire west coast inland to the western great plains would be a radioactive ash pile for the next 100,000 years. Then there's the entirety of Europe in the same radioactive ash pile.
That's a good thing? Please, pull your head out of your ass and smell the coffee.
The only way to win a nuclear war is to not play the game.
Nemo
@Rollory
ReplyDeleteI promise you that this is not a common sentiment. It probably was some stupid kid - Rod Dreher has a tendency to pick up on such "extremists" and make much more out of it than is real.
In fact the opposite is true: we, Poles, we're rather afraid of WW3. One reason is the Russian "deescalation through escalation" strategy.
wojtek
Are you kidding? What ever isn't vaporized in the initial nuclear fireballs, the whole rest of the U.S. eastern seaboard from Me to Fl and inland to the Mississippi and the entire west coast inland to the western great plains would be a radioactive ash pile for the next 100,000 years. Then there's the entirety of Europe in the same radioactive ash pile.
ReplyDelete--not saying it would be a rose garden, but just pointing out that people still live in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, only 75 years later, which is the only real world examples we have.
Yes, I understand the difference in destructive power of modern weapons. I also remember inspectors being quite surprised by the decrepit state of the USSR's nuclear arsenal. From looking at our own, and the constant care and attention it needs, I don't think the russians have it in them to maintain a massive capability.
No, I don't want even one of any size on my city, or even my continent. But the statement made was kinda hysterical and over the top and doesn't match what we know, or think we know.
pdf of some useful, already paid for info...
https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/prep_radiological_fact_sheet.pdf
n