The trial had already started. With new evidence, why move for dismissal on a technicality instead of a directed verdict, which would be exonerating? He's off the hook legally, but everyone is going to wonder why he didn't even want to move for acquittal based on the evidence.
Just came by to thank you for your coverage of the Baldwin fiasco. I've used your information to explain to people why Baldwin was not negligent and they in turn have also found it useful.
Well you called it. Things went hot in PA today.
ReplyDeleteThe trial had already started. With new evidence, why move for dismissal on a technicality instead of a directed verdict, which would be exonerating? He's off the hook legally, but everyone is going to wonder why he didn't even want to move for acquittal based on the evidence.
ReplyDeletehttp://zelmanpartisans.com/?p=54031
Hey Aesop,
ReplyDeleteJust came by to thank you for your coverage of the Baldwin fiasco. I've used your information to explain to people why Baldwin was not negligent and they in turn have also found it useful.