For those terminally foolish enough to think that COINTELPRO ended in the 1970s, head over to Divemedic's blog.
Watch the video. Eyes and ears open. Absorb the message.
If you thought this was all just Boogeyman campfire stories, wise up.
For those terminally foolish enough to think that COINTELPRO ended in the 1970s, head over to Divemedic's blog.
Watch the video. Eyes and ears open. Absorb the message.
If you thought this was all just Boogeyman campfire stories, wise up.
It's still alive, certainly. Per Turchin, one thing that the Elite *has* to control is the narrative.
ReplyDeleteOk, I am not going to say whether the content of the video is either a put on or on the up and up. I lack the underlying context to evaluate it. I have had dealings with Langley in a prior life. Those SOBs are so tight lipped they won't even tell the Mrs. when they had sex last night. That this gentlemen is so glib about his dealings runs counter to my experience. Just a gut on my part.
ReplyDeleteIt appears that the video in question has broken out into the leading edge -- https://www.zerohedge.com/political/alex-jones-sue-cia-after-undercover-report-claims-agency-went-after-him-hardcore
ReplyDeleteI wish Alex good luck but will be for naught.
Bear well in mind the schmuck on the video was
ReplyDeletea) totally unaware he was being taped
b) a contractor, not a full-time employee
c) an idiot
With those three strikes against him, I have no trouble whatsoever giving that video 1-A reliability and accuracy.
Aesop;
ReplyDeleteb) a contractor, not a full-time employee
Nope, you misunderstood.
He's Civil Service, you can be assured. He said he's a 'Contracting Officer', as in he's a bureaucrat paper-pusher who makes up the contracts and approves the contractors the CIA deals with.
When I was a DA Civilian, we had several of them on staff. The DoD has precise standards and training that a CO has to pass, as opposed to that idjit who likely is getting kickbacks.
a) and c) are still quite correct.
The only "officers" the CIA employs as permanent staff are case officers.
ReplyDeleteHe's not one of those, so he's an as-needed hire.
You'll see how much he's not "civil service" when you see how fast he's let go as this gains in notoriety.
The minute that video surfaced, his employment was terminated, whether anyone knew it or not, including the subject of the interview.
He may occasionally be affiliated with CIA projects, and they may cut him a check from time to time, but he's not a bona fide employee, per se.
The first thing people actually employed by the CIA learn, is not to talk about being employed by the CIA. Not to anyone, least of all shooting their mouths off at lunch.
This guy is like that fat retard who was running flights to Central America who started waving his CIA ties around by way of explanation, and got dropped like a hot potato, and found those ties didn't exist as an immediate result.
Watch and see.
Aesop;
ReplyDeleteI'm not responding to refute what you think is factual via your apparent vast knowledge of the IC and the excepted civil service (which I retired from with career status) but just to make sure you understand that you didn't cow, or 'wow' me.
You know movie safety and ICU operations at the SME level and more. I don't, and don't make uninformed observations about those professions.
The dork (as 99 44/100% of those in the IC are) is in the excepted service and can still be easily 'let go'. All the agency has to do - and probably will as I've seen similar dorks get canned - is to pull his clearance, and out the door he goes.
Now, we can get into a dick measuring contest where you go and use the epithets you normally do when someone doesn't happen to agree with you 100% or you can inform my ignorance and tell me when you were in the IC excepted service and the CIA and I'll shut up.
Cool your jets, JB.
ReplyDeleteI wasn't trying to cow you nor wow you. I think we're saying similar things differently.
What Fucktard is absolutely not, is anyone involved with clandestine services, nor with any need-to-know whatsoever about the topics upon which he is popping off.
The operations he's opining on are far outside of his lane.
And obviously, his league.
https://www.cia.gov/careers/jobs/contracting-officer/
If he wants to speak of how he used to break the law and conduct domestic operations in his former days with Far Beyond Insanity, he's free to do so, assuming he worked for them ever, either, unless that too was in a non-sworn agent, civil service capacity. Even that is similarly suspect.
What he knows (or thinks he knows) about the CIA doing anything like this are overwhelmingly likely to fall into the categories of Jack, and Shit.
Yakking about his alleged current employer, IMHO, is proof that he isn't an insider, or he'd know better. I have dealt with a number of former employees of both agencies (who end up in all sorts of places you wouldn't expect), even been relatively close friends with a couple, and they are notoriously taciturn, even about things so old the countries involved don't exist anymore, and the presidents who oversaw them long dead and buried.
They simply aren't ever as loquacious as this buffoon.
That, in itself, should be a huge red flag, absent independent confirmation.
Tell me different, and how I'm getting that wrong, because the People Who Know run off at the mouth this spectacularly.
This guy makes Sean Bean in Ronin or Bill Paxton in True Lies look credible by comparison.
Either way, getting his clearance yanked is probably the least of his worries now.
Unless this is deliberately planned and planted misinformation, what he's doing is rapidly progressing up the spectrum from mere active embarrassment to full-fledged liability.